Skip to main content




Jonah Hex Movie Analysis: What Went Wrong?


"Jonah Hex" (2010) is a lackluster superhero film that tries to blend Western and supernatural elements but ends up feeling disjointed and underwhelming. Despite a gritty premise and some stylized action, the film's weak plot, uneven tone, and poor CGI hinder its impact, making it a forgettable entry in the genre. Mediocre superhero Western with potential that falls flat.
For More Review Of This Movie Visit My Blog...

reelsreviewcinemascopereviews.…

Hey! Please share this post. Thanks!



Access to Work: cuts to support putting employment out of reach – Channel 4 News

So disabled benefits that help disabled people to work (PIP) is getting cut to force disabled into work AND support in work to enable them to work is being cut. Make it make sense.
channel4.com/news/access-to-wo…

#TakingThePIP
#PIP
#Disabled
#AccessToWork



This Movie Will Make You NEVER Smile Again!


Creepy and unsettling horror with a memorable premise—"Smile" (2022) delivers chilling scares and tense atmosphere.
For More Review Of This Movie Visit My Blog...

reelsreviewcinemascopereviews.…

Spread the word!



Back in Action Netflix Review - Is It Worth Watching?


"Back in Action" is a generic action-comedy that largely wastes its talented cast, delivering predictable jokes and uninspired action sequences, though some find it a fun, light watch.
For More Review Of This Movie Visit My Blog...

reelsreviewcinemascopereviews.…

Please share my post.



Pet peeve... there are people now calling anything cgi or camera tricks AI...
It's going to get really bad for artists...

#ai #cgi

#ai #cgi

reshared this




Biologics Market Size, Share, Growth Factors, Competitive Landscape, with Regional Forecast to 2035


The Global Biologics Market Report is a comprehensive report on the Biologics market, offering key insights on business strategies, current trends, and presenting qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Biologics market. This report offers in-depth research insights on key and significant aspects of the Biologics market, providing an in-depth analysis of key drivers, restraints, restraints, growth prospects, threats, and risks. The report also includes an in-depth analysis of the competitive landscape and regional scope of the Biologics market.

The global Biologics Market report employs an extremely extensive and perceptive process that analyzes statistical data relating to services and products offered in the market. The research study is a pivotal document in understanding the needs and wants of the clients. The report is comprised of significant data about the leading companies and their marketing strategies. The Biologics industry is witnessing an expansion and change of dynamics owing to the entry of several new players.

The study outlines the rapidly evolving and growing market segments along with valuable insights into each element of the industry. The industry has witnessed the entry of several new players, and the report aims to deliver insightful information about their transition and growth in the market. Mergers, acquisitions, partnerships, agreements, product launches, and joint ventures are all outlined in the report.

Key Companies Profiled in the Report are

Amgen
AbbVie
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Celltrion Healthcare
Eli Lilly
Hoffmann La-Roche
GlaxoSmithKline
Johnson & Johnson
Novo Nordisk
Sanofi
Samsung BioLogics
Biologics Market, Till 2035: Distribution by Type of Product (2-Ethylhexyl Biologics, Butyl Biologics, Ethyl Biologics, Methyl Biologics), Type of Grade (Chemical Grade, Pharmaceutical Grade, Standard Grade, and, Technical Grade), Type of Application (Adhesive & Sealants, Fabrics, Paints & Coating, Papers & Paperboard, Personal Care Products, Plastics, Textiles, Others) Type of End User (Automotive, Construction, Consumer Goods, Electronics, Healthcare, Packaging, Textiles).

The research report offers a comprehensive regional analysis of the market with regards to production and consumption patterns, import/export, market size and share in terms of volume and value, supply and demand dynamics, and presence of prominent players in each market.

Regional Analysis Covers:

North America (U.S., Canada)
Europe (U.K., Italy, Germany, France, Rest of EU)
Asia Pacific (India, Japan, China, South Korea, Australia, Rest of APAC)
Latin America (Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Rest of Latin America)
Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, U.A.E., South Africa, Rest of MEA)
To know more about the report, visit @

rootsanalysis.com/reports/biol…


Furthermore, the report provides analytical data in an organized format segmented into charts, tables, graphs, figures, and diagrams. This enables readers to understand the market scenario in an easy and beneficial manner. Moreover, the report aims to impart a prospective outlook and draw an informative conclusion to assist the reader in making lucrative business decisions. The report, in conclusion, provides a detailed analysis of the segments expected to dominate the market, the regional bifurcation, the estimated market size and share, and comprehensive SWOT analysis and Porter’s Five Forces Analysis.

Thank you for reading our report. For further queries, please connect with us, and our team will provide you the report best suited to your requirements.

About Roots Analysis

Roots Analysis is a global leader in the market research. Having worked with over 750 clients worldwide, including Fortune 500 companies, start-ups, academia, venture capitalists and strategic investors for more than a decade, we offer a highly analytical / data-driven perspective to a network of over 450,000 senior industry stakeholders looking for credible market insights. All reports provided by us are structured in a way that enables the reader to develop a thorough perspective on the given subject. Apart from writing reports on identified areas, we provide bespoke research / consulting services dedicated to serve our clients in the best possible way.

Contact Details

Roots Analysis

Gaurav Chaudhary

+1 (857) 387 7999
+44 (748) 188 1310

Gaurav.chaudhary@rootsanalysis.com

Website: rootsanalysis.com/



Edit: because it seems like people are confused, I'm not asking for clarity in how to talk about these things. Just commenting on how much of our language is dominated by allistic norms and an amusing joking idea. I have no interest in "here's how to make it clear you're asking someone on a date" and any comments in that vein will just contribute to a now forming headache...

Random half-joking idea with my sibling when talking about how dumb the differences are between hangout and date are (pretty much arbitrary definitions).

Idea crossed my mind of, we need an explicitly autistic language. Y'know, one where intents are part of the conjugation.

#Autism #language

reshared this

in reply to Shiri Bailem

English seem fine for me if I speak explicitly. Them not understanding English is their problem.


us politics, protests

Honestly don't talk about this much because I don't expect to get heard...

Almost no protest happening right now in the US is doing anything more than defusing protests that can actually work.

I'm not saying protests don't work, I'm not saying nonviolent protests don't work... I'm saying current protest tactics accomplish nothing toward the ends they're pursuing.

Protests work in one of two ways:
* They draw attention to an issue people are unaware of
* They are a threat that if things don't change they'll get worse

All we do is the first, and it doesn't work because everybody already knows. They either have heard the message and can't do anything or they don't care, alternatively they thing it's all made up/blown out of proportion/etc and there's no way to show them proof of that by showing up to a protest.

The largest protests of our time made for symbolic, but ultimately fruitless victories. They got so big that they accidentally crossed into threat territory and they sent in the cops to shut it down... and because they were met entirely with passive non-violence, the threat disappeared as soon as they had a symbolic victory. They threw a few token scraps and made a show of enacting changes that they gradually rolled back within a year or two.

The second option also doesn't mean we go out there throwing molotovs right now...

It means we go out there saying "stop what you're doing or we'll give you a real problem to deal with". And it doesn't just mean violence against people, it can absolutely be violence against objects and institutions. It means burning down cop cars, it means sabotaging ICE vehicles, it means smashing the windows of businesses that donate to or provide support to cops and crooked politicians.

And more important than the actual violence and harm is the simple threat... "Fix this, or we escalate".

I'll leave it there because I know I'll already get so many people preaching the propaganda that violence never solves anything, that all we have to do is politely ask loud enough and they'll turn from their evil ways like life is some saturday morning cartoon.

in reply to Shiri Bailem

us politics, protests
Nazi Germany wasn't beaten by non-violent protests... and to all the people calling current events "unprecedented"... ::gestures to 1932-33::




Si quelqu'un vous traite d'amateur, rappelez-lui que ce sont des amateurs qui ont fait l'Arche de Noé et des professionnels qui ont fait le Titanic.


Citation apocryphe venant probablement de Richard J. Needham en 1979 sous la forme:

«L'arche a été construite par des amateurs, mais des professionnels ont construit le Titanic.»

La citation varie et mentionne parfois l'arche en premier, ou le Titanic en premier, ou les amateurs en premier, ou les professionnels en premier. Les variantes incluent:
- L'arche a été construite par des amateurs, mais le Titanic a été construit par des professionnels.
- Le Titanic a été construit par des professionnels, mais l'arche a été construite par des amateurs.
- Des amateurs ont construit l'arche. Des professionnels ont construit le Titanic.
- Des professionnels ont construit le Titanic. Des amateurs ont construit l'arche.
Des nombres sont parfois ajoutés pour souligner: « Un amateur solitaire a construit l'arche. Une équipe de professionnels a construit le Titanic. Le mot "mais" est souvent omis, créant deux phrases. "Arche" est souvent en majuscule. La citation est souvent répertoriée comme «anonyme» ou «auteur inconnu». Un "Frank Pepper" est parfois donné comme auteur, mais il n'est jamais expliqué qui est cette personne, ni quand il l'a dit. Les premières citations proviennent de sources non américaines. Le Globe and Mail (Canada) sort cette phrase en 1979 et l'attribue à Richard J. Needham (1912-1996). Une source de 1981 attribue le dicton à "un comédien britannique mécontent". Il y a deux citations de 1984 d'Angleterre et une citation de 1985 d'Irlande (attribuée à "John Parker"). Richard Needham (né en 1942) a utilisé l'expression en 1984 et dans ses mémoires, Battling for Peace: Northern Ireland's Longest-Serving British Minister (1999), mais il n'y a aucune raison de soupçonner que ce Richard Needham a utilisé le dicton avant la référence de 1979 du Canadien Richard J. Needham.

barrypopik.com/blog/the_ark_wa…


|Si quelqu'un vous traite d'amateur, rappelez-lui que ce sont des amateurs qui ont fait l'Arche de Noé et des professionnels qui ont fait le Titanic.|



La mémoire, c'est comme les amis; elle vous laisse souvent tomber au moment où on a le plus besoin.


Apparemment ce serait plus un dicton mexicain rapporté par María Esther Pozo Vallejo dans la revue Vertigo (2004) sous une forme différente (et plus logique):

«La memoria es como el mal amigo: cuando más falta te hace, te falla.»

«La mémoire est comme un mauvais ami: au moment où vous en avez le plus besoin, elle vous fait défaut.»


|La mémoire, c'est comme les amis; elle vous laisse souvent tomber au moment où on a le plus besoin.|



La solitude est bonne aux grands esprits et mauvaise aux petits. La solitude trouble les cerveaux qu'elle n'illumine pas.


Citation extraite de "Choses vues", recueil de notes et de mémoires de Victor Hugo, initialement publié à titre posthume sous la forme de deux séries, en 1887 et en 1900. Ce passage vient d'une note sur l'attentat de Lecomte datant du 6 juin 1846.

google.fr/books/edition/Oeuvre…

Extrait de la note de Victor Hugo sur l'attentat de Lecomte datant du 6 juin 1846:

Je suis frappé de l'unanimité imposante de cette imposante assemblée. Mais l'opinion de M. le chancelier, l'unanimité de la cour, cela est beaucoup en présence du raisonnement, cela n'est rien devant la conscience. Avant les débats, j'ai lu, relu, étudié toutes les pièces du procès; pendant les débats, j'ai considéré l'attitude, la physionomie, les gestes, j'ai scruté l'âme de l'accusé. Eh bien, je le dis à cette cour composée d'hommes justes, je le dis à M. le chancelier dont l'opinion a tant de poids, je persiste dans mon vote. L'accusé est un homme solitaire. La solitude est bonne aux grands esprits et mauvaise aux petits. La solitude trouble les cerveaux qu'elle n'illumine pas. Pierre Lecomte, homme solitaire, esprit chétif, devait de toute nécessité devenir un homme farouche et un esprit troublé. L'attentat sur le roi, l'attentat sur un père, et à quelle heure! lorsqu'il est entouré de sa famille! l'attentat sur un groupe de femmes et d'enfants, la mort jetée au hasard, vingt crimes possibles ajoutés et mêlés à un crime voulu, voilà l'action. Elle est monstrueuse. Maintenant, examinons le motif, le voici: Une retenue de vingt francs sur une gratification annuelle, une démission acceptée, trois lettres restées sans réponse. Comment ne pas être frappé d'un tel rapprochement et d'un tel abîme? Je le répète en terminant, en présence de ces deux extrêmes, le crime le plus grand, le motif le plus futile, il est évident pour moi, que la raison manque, que la pensée qui a fait un tel rapprochement et franchi un tel abime n'est pas une pensée lucide, et que ce coupable, cet assassin, cet homme sauvage et solitaire, cet être effaré et féroce, est un fou. Ce n'est pas un fou pour un médecin peut-être, c'est un fou à coup sûr pour un moraliste. J'ajoute que la politique est ici d'accord avec la justice, et qu'il est toujours bon de retirer la raison humaine d'un crime qui révolte la nature et qui ébranle la société. Je persiste dans mon vote.


|La solitude est bonne aux grands esprits et mauvaise aux petits. La solitude trouble les cerveaux qu'elle n'illumine pas.|



that didn't do what i think it would've, should probably learn how to actually use this thing


cw: BlueSky moderation, USPol, queerphobia, psa


this post being blocked by BlueSky moderation says a whole hell of a lot about their stance on things

zaki reshared this.