Skip to main content

Friendica Admins reshared this.


!Friendica Admins I've got a persistent issue lingering from messier storage transfers that had to be done when I moved. I just wasn't able to fit the media storage on the current semi-temporary box but not everything would transfer into S3 so I was forced to just delete the media folder without being fully transferred.

Since then a lot of images (typically profile pictures or older posts) are blurry and it seems clear the server isn't trying to re-download anything lost.

I'm needing a way to sort of kick it to get it to redownload those lost images?

in reply to Shiri Bailem Friendica Admins reshared this.

Hmm, that's weird, since that should always work. Does it work for new contacts and new posts?
in reply to Michael Vogel Friendica Admins reshared this.

@Michael Vogel honestly, now that you mention it since it was so common I was kinda just glossing over it and I think it is happening on some newer media too which could mean there's a problem with the S3 backend add-on, likely the same problem that caused much of the old media to not transfer.


in reply to GPLv7 ionizedgirl

that's hardly comparable (and not relevant); llms have simply no cognitive capabilities. @nicemicro
in reply to flere-imsaho

@mawhrin well we can still do some comparisons, but one neuron does not equate to one parameter. if you want a meaningful analogy, then you have to compare the number of parameters to the number of connections between neurons.

of course we can't really quantify cognition, so comparing things based on that is always just how one feels about that. I mean, technically, I might be the only conscious person in the universe, I have no way checking if anyone else has. 😂



too many people outed themselves as bigots and Nazis, Elon had to fix it... https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/23/24163155/twitter-x-likes-hide-default

anubis2814 reshared this.



... now, to cry in relief...


<Insert Profanities>


So the temporary system had some sort of failure, I'm not even 100% sure what caused it to be honest. It went down sometime yesterday and some of the virtual drives got corrupted, which caught the database and the virtual gateway device.

I was able to restore the system... most of the way. Thankfully there are backups of the database, but some of them were also flawed as well, the most recent intact one was from 5/16, so 5 days were lost.

To be clear, this problem was exacerbated by the fact that there's not as much redundancy in the temporary setup (sadly it looks like it'll be a few more months before I have a place of my own and can spin up my own hardware again). But I'm going to still look at how I might get those in better shape.

As far as how long it took: I had a busy day yesterday and didn't see that the server was down until I was too exhausted to do anything about it, so it had to wait until I got off work today... each attempt at restoring the database takes around an hour, so that took *a while* to get restored.



Shiri Bailem reshared this.


<Insert Profanities>


So the temporary system had some sort of failure, I'm not even 100% sure what caused it to be honest. It went down sometime yesterday and some of the virtual drives got corrupted, which caught the database and the virtual gateway device.

I was able to restore the system... most of the way. Thankfully there are backups of the database, but some of them were also flawed as well, the most recent intact one was from 5/16, so 5 days were lost.

To be clear, this problem was exacerbated by the fact that there's not as much redundancy in the temporary setup (sadly it looks like it'll be a few more months before I have a place of my own and can spin up my own hardware again). But I'm going to still look at how I might get those in better shape.

As far as how long it took: I had a busy day yesterday and didn't see that the server was down until I was too exhausted to do anything about it, so it had to wait until I got off work today... each attempt at restoring the database takes around an hour, so that took *a while* to get restored.

Shiri Bailem reshared this.


in reply to David Revoy

can we see the influence of the Luggage from the Discworld series? 😉😄
Unknown parent

David Revoy
@Da_Gut 😆 😆 😆


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


I hope this email finds you no matter how well you think you've disguised yourself.

actuallyadhd group reshared this.


... ugh...

https://youtu.be/DlFkfOqtgR8?si=2e-AF281n1ZGHdKg

#ADHD #neurodivegent @actuallyadhd group @adhd group

reshared this




Content warning: Meme image joking about real world murders (mocking murderers)



The price of love is pain*...

What do you do when your capacity for pain is getting used up faster than your capacity for love?

(* for those unfamiliar with the saying: loving someone inevitably means pain at their loss, pain at their suffering, and general vulnerability. In my case, mostly loved ones struggling and being traumatized by various systemic injustices...)



The raw surrealness that hits you from time to time when transitioning...

I thought I was a guy... now I'm thinking of myself as a woman.

I used to look in the mirror and always feel blah, and unmemorable unattractive face... now I see a face I genuinely recognize and remember, a face that I can feel attractive wearing (even if I'm not my own type and will never really see it myself)

My hair which was always just an uninteresting mess... turns out it likes to naturally grow into a cute bob (though I'd still like to try styling it more).

Oh... and boobs, just boobs.

#trans #transfemme #SecondPuberty #lgbtqia

in reply to Shiri Bailem

I have seen a lot of people use anime gao kigurumi as a mental help and encouragement with transitioning, just because the hadatai covers imperfections up, and with shapewear, people see what they would like to have.

It is a tough road.


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


normalize cuddling your friends

reshared this

in reply to allie 🌺 Shiri Bailem reshared this.

also: normalize she/her boys and he/him girls
in reply to allie 🌺 Andrea might be oversharing reshared this.

also also: normalize skirts. on everyone.

reshared this


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


Bigot logic:

79% of violent crimes committed by men = NOT ALL MEN ARE VIOLENT

0% of violent crimes committed by transgender women = ALL TRANSGENDER WOMEN ARE VIOLENT

Shiri Bailem reshared this.

in reply to Joan Westenberg

It's not actually 0%, but close enough.

Then again they never let hypocrisy get in the way of their CIS white snowflake agenda.

in reply to Joan Westenberg

the 'not all men' BS that men use to justify, well, everything is a logical fallacy

we need to start teaching logic in elementary school

check out "no true scotsman" appeal to purity



Rant about AI:

Sadly there's no reasonable way to differentiate AI content from "real" content. And regardless of your opinions on AI there's no "stopping" it (it's a "cat's out of the bag" situation, you can run these things on your home computer with open source software... there's no way short of an apocalypse to stop development from here).

What we do have is a lot of fighting and little effort to work on solutions of living with this. And I think worse yet many taking the anti-AI stance, especially the loudest of them, are basically making things worse because real solutions are anathema to them (ie. anything short of an outright ban on the technology is unacceptable, which means they tend to push back against even efforts to rein in AI or talk over those who want to push those efforts).

On top of that you have the borderline predatory push of "AI Detection Tools" and "AI Poisoning". The detection tools are a question of "How many real lives are you okay with ruining to catch a handful of bad uses cases in AI because there is zero way to have any certainty on the accuracy of these tools?" while poisoning tools are a security blanket that leads to people dropping their defenses because they don't stop AI, just slightly delay it's access to your content (even the creators of those tools acknowledge that AI will quickly bypass them, at which point there's no difference in whether or not you used that tool), worse yet as AI gets further incorporated in search tools it can make it harder to get visibility and exposure over AI generated content.

What we really need to be focusing on to address the problems with AI:

  • Learning how copyright works (in my experience artists tend to have a woefully bad understanding of what is or isn't covered) and making sure corporations don't lobby the government into allowing copyright on AI works (under current law they are public domain, aka. no copyright, but there's already been one case of pushing that they can copyright "arrangements" of AI works). This means if they want to actually have a copyright on art, they've got to pay a human artist
  • We need to push for reporting requirements/standards. One of the most toxic elements is how much AI floods spaces and bumps out human artists, especially when they attack the prompt containing the artist's name (meaning searching for that artist can turn up more AI work than their actual work)... there needs to be a requirement that AI art be labeled. This also works with the previous point as it is similar to being able to search for something released Creative Commons.
  • Push for copyright responsibility in outputs rather than training data inputs. This sounds like something that is already one of the loudest arguments, but really isn't. Most arguments I hear try to go after AI tools for copyright content in their training data... but if you actually learn copyright you realize that a victory here largely means that major companies get more of an advantage because copyright only applies when content is copied (ie. when the training data is made available for smaller companies to run their own) vs when content is transformed (despite popular opinion, the vast majority of AI output does not violate copyright and qualifies as a transformative work... see again learning copyright law, plus a dash of learning how these tools actually work). Responsibility in outputs means that an AI can violate copyright (if I ask an AI tool to give me the first chapter of a copyrighted book and it does so... that is a violation and they need to genuinely be responsible for taking measures to prevent this from happening, but there should also be leeway for "forced violations", ie. when you bend over backwards to make it break copyright vs just saying "give me the first chapter of...")
  • Work on learning and developing responsible usage. Again despite popular artist opinion, there genuinely is a lot of responsible use cases for all these AI technologies, from using LLMs to help debug code, summarize text, prioritize lists to voice duplicators used, with the license of the original VA, being used for dynamic speech (ie. voice assistants or actually speaking a player's name in a video game in the middle of otherwise pre-recorded output). And that's not to ignore image generators which can be used for enhancing/repairing old photos, or just used for general visual effects on your own art (ie. the filters everyone uses on instagram or the like... much of them are the exact same tech as AI Image Generators)
  • And as always... fighting capitalism because the real threat of AI is the same as any other technology advancement: if CEOs can replace you with a machine, they will, and we live in a society where no employment means risk of death.

#AI #ResponsibleAI #Rant


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


Both of those things are definitely brave. (by u/Maureen0569)

Shiri Bailem reshared this.



Filtered word: nsfw

#nsfw

Shiri Bailem reshared this.


Conservatives would celebrate shutting hospitals just to have the privilege of laughing at their neighbours for being sick.

Shiri Bailem reshared this.

in reply to Joan Westenberg

Also, prevent those sick people from being signed off work because being too sick to work is "a lifestyle choice".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68853166



https://gallusrostromegalus.tumblr.com/post/694785489193107456/ok-so-you-know-those-high-school-house-parties


https://youtube.com/shorts/kenDWpNu6Go?si=trjaVijoU6i5ef8w

#ADHD #AuDHD


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


really interesting how the concept of childhood is so elastic that it can stretch to contain the 24-Year-Old Transgender Youth and dodge the 11-Year-Old Black Man
in reply to homosocial climber Julia :v_trans: :v_bi: reshared this.

"childhood" is a construction of absolute disempowerment and "adulthood" is a construction of absolute responsibility and both are fundamentally dehumanizing

Shiri Bailem reshared this.


Are you #ActuallyAutistic? You may find this satire website incredibly funny. I know I did.

https://thedailytism.com/

reshared this


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


I feel this so hard. Why can't people just be clear about what they want?
#autism #actuallyAutistic @actuallyautistic
#feels

reshared this

in reply to Elizabeth

@Elizabeth3

The question writer meant the answer to be an analogue clock, not a digital one.

in reply to Zumbador

@Zumbador but they didn’t say… oh ok I’ve caught up with you now

Shiri Bailem reshared this.


Dear Diary:

They're assaulting me from every angle, insisting I'm... cute... somhow... I don't know what it is they see but they're relentless. I don't know if I'll survive...

reshared this


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


Content warning: ????

reshared this


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


Tonight, I'm overthinking idioms.

"I trust him about as far as I can throw him."

As an #ActuallyAutistic person, this one baffled me. What does your ability to throw them have to do with their trustworthiness? After awhile, I just accepted that these things don't always make much sense, but the idea behind them is what's important.

Well tonight I'm here to propose (unseriously) that there is infact a deeper meaning!

"I trust him about as far as I can throw him," means you don't trust him. But, if taken literally, if you could throw him pretty far, then you'd trust him, right?

If you're a manipulative or controlling person, then your ability to move someone else around a given space is important to you. As someone with a background in horse training, I can tell you that the one who yields or moves out of the way is submissive to the one pushing. This may seem obvious, but it's important in small interactions, not just big, sweeping gestures. If someone looks like they might be trying to move past you, and you scooch out of their way to let them, you are submitting to them. In a reasonable society, that's called "working together" and "being polite". In a herd hierarchy, or a manipulative relationship, it's about someone taking your space, and it'll be performed multiple times just to enforce the hierarchy.

(I want to make it clear that this has nothing to do with D/s relationships and dynamics. That is a very specific niche, and has nothing to do with these ramblings.)

Back to the idiom. If you're a controlling person, and you can't control someone else's movements, because they're too stubborn, or can fend you off, or you're not strong enough, then you're not likely to want much to do with them. You can't trust them, because they're not in your control.

Shiri Bailem reshared this.

in reply to anomalon :gi:

@anomalon There are a lot of ways to overthink that idiom, but I think the message meant to be conveyed is "I don't trust him out of my sight."
in reply to Bernie Independently Does It

@BernieDoesIt @anomalon
ooh that's an interesting take, I never thought of it like that. I always took it as, kind of sarcastic? Similar to a lot of "southernisms". "He couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions on the heel" isn't literal, it's meant to convey his stupidity with an imaginary scenario. It's funny how the same phrase can be understood in so many ways 😂

Shiri Bailem reshared this.


reshared this


Shiri Bailem reshared this.


i love how the tl posts stuff and sometimes i'm just like: oh yeah i had the same brainworm, i'll link you to my post

reshared this



Shiri Bailem reshared this.


A new instance and a new introduction.

I joined Mastodon in Nov. 2022. I was not of the twitter wave. This was in fact my first ever social media site I ever joined and still the only one that I'm on. It was simply a step on my autism awareness journey and a reaching out to others like me. I cannot express how much I've learnt and grown as a consequence and how much I value this place and all those I have met within it.

For the purpose of clarity and should anyone want to know. I am self-diagnosed and quite content to remain that way. I also hate the term self-diagnosed and much prefer self-realised. For this is a far more accurate and precise way of describing the process of discovery that I went through. Because no one wakes up one morning and just decides that they are autistic. It takes months, or even years in my case, to be able to convince ourselves, often against our own desires and judgement, that we are.

Diagnosis also implies that this is a medical condition and that what I am doing by self-diagnosing is essentially playing doctor, when only an official diagnosis can reveal that truth. Just like it does with most things medical. But autism, at its core, is a neurological difference not a disorder (although some of the things that can come with it most certainly are) and whilst at the moment it is diagnosable, so was being a homosexual once.

Because the harsh truth is that anything that is different from, will almost always be recognised only as a deviation from and a fault with, until it is properly understood and in my own small way, this is what I'm trying to do and to help others to do.

#Autism
#ActuallyAutistic

reshared this




My sister Chelsie is struggling emotionally with potty training her kid, so I edited a popular meme to be more relevant.

#StarTrek #Parenting #PottyTraining #StarTrekTNG

in reply to Shiri Bailem

our eldest took to using the potty relatively well (heavy emphasis on relatively). Which naturally means our second is going to be an absolute nightmare right?

That's how everything else has gone.



Maybe I should pin a post or add it to the description or something that I'm Jewish Anti-Zionist and don't tolerate the bullshit "criticism of Israel's war crimes is antisemitism" narrative...

Yeah... I think I'm going to add that to the description, because if someone is going to defederate because they think the Israeli government is synonymous with the entire Jewish people, or think they can just conveniently ignore war crimes and colonialism because people on the other side have also done bad things...

Hell, I'll even tag myself in #fediblock if people want to take the trash out for me.

in reply to Shiri Bailem

Oh wait, already did... maybe I need to make it more prevalent?

(Edited as based on a reply it was far too easily misread. Previously said "Admin is a Jew" and it never dawned on me that someone could think it meant the admin of the zionist server rather than myself)

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Shiri Bailem

i mean this is literally just saying the quiet part out loud isn't it. "blocking this server because the admin is a Jew... err, a Zionist."

amazing that they then have the gall to put a little asterisk next to racism and explain that they don't tolerate dogwhistles. apparently foghorns are okay though.

in reply to Psy Chuan :therian:

@Psy Chuan :therian: okay, that definitely needs clarification and I hadn't realized... fixing that now. "admin is a Jew" is talking about myself, not the server being blocked.
in reply to Shiri Bailem

oh goodness i am so sorry i thought that screenshot was of someone putting out a block report for you, i'm sorry i came off so hostile.
in reply to Shiri Bailem

Not a Zionist, but fairly sure Zionists also acknowledge that Israel has committed lots of war crimes and atrocities.

Obviously your server your rules, but I have found no matter how strenuously you tell people otherwise, people will label you a Zionist as soon as they find your views on Israel politically inconvenient.

I just feel that the people who most need to see that don't read bios and pinned posts.

in reply to ראַף 🟣

@raf 🟣 I mean I'm not taking the angle of "don't you dare call me a zionist" but rather that from my side of things modern zionism, especially in the US equates to a fervent belief that Israel is synonymous with Judaism and any criticism of Israel is antisemitic.

This kicked off especially from the fediblock post in which someone was rallying against the EndAntisemitism account for it's labeling of any criticism of Israel's military action in Gaza as antisemitic and the ensuing accusations.

While I think the fediblock post was poorly handled, I do agree with the fundamentals underneath that it's not remotely acceptable to label criticism of the Israeli government to be inherently antisemitic.

Mostly, I'm just cranky and ranting. I'm not worried about being called a Zionist at any point... only time it can maybe happen with my views is if I'm talking to someone who is advocating the immediate abrupt abolition of the country.

in reply to Shiri Bailem

As the person who operates the EndAntisemitism account, I feel what it does and how it operates was grossly mischaracterised.

I literally label every post with why I think it's antisemitism. NONE of the reasons are about the military actions taken by the IDF. I stress repeatedly that if a reader disagrees with the report, they can just ignore it.

I criticise the Israeli govt regularly both publicly and privately. But the idea that no criticism of the Israeli government can be antisemitic is absurd and nonsensical.

We used to be mufos so I feel you should have some sense of where I stand on all this bullshit. We live in a world where Ilan Pappe and Norm Finkelstein have both been called Zionists. No one is immune from being called a Zionist and harassed shortly afterwards.

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to ראַף 🟣

@raf 🟣 Mufos?

Since you're the one running the account I do think it's lacking in detail on those particular callouts then.

To be clear, I've only blocked one person in all of this and that was only a personal block rather than a server block.

I will admit to unfollowing you but there's no spite, we're just somewhat different in values there (ie. we draw the line in different places) and it's less about who you are as a person and really just more about what shows up in my feed (ie. posts you comment on, etc where too much of what was showing up in my feed related to your activity is just on the other side of the line from me)

in reply to Shiri Bailem

To be clear, you don't have to justify unfollowing. I'm just more saying we are likely not all the different.

I only have 500 characters on that account and the label set is restricted. So there is some shorthand. When I say "Holocaust inversion" I mean comparing what some Jews are doing to the Holocaust. When I say "Nazi inversion" I mean comparing Jews to Nazis.

Some people don't think that constitutes antisemitism. Some do. I'd like to think people can talk about the atrocities in Gaza without mentioning Hitler and Auschwitz, mostly because the vast majority of people on the network do just that.

I am constantly refining and raising my standards, and I already put in way more effort into each of my reports than most Fediblocks I've seen.

You say those callouts, but Ned did not point to a single callout. And ignored all requests made of him to link directly to a single problematic one.

in reply to ראַף 🟣

@raf it's occurred to me that the end antisemitism mastadon account and Ben-Gvir have never been seen together at the same time.

Seems suspicious.

in reply to ראַף 🟣

@raf 🟣 Perhaps in the the description of your account make a note along the lines of "if it's a disputed topic, we err on the side of reporting so that you can make the decision yourself"

I think that clears the air alot

in reply to Shiri Bailem

@Shiri Bailem I know! I hate it when people say that any criticism of Israel is antisemitic.

Shiri Bailem reshared this.


Daddy Issues: The Mecha Anime

reshared this



Shiri Bailem reshared this.


This goes out to the other #trans people in the Fediverse, let's destroy the myth that "you're too old" to start transitioning later in life. I started hormones when I was 35 and my changes have been amazing..

..how old were YOU when you started your transition or HRT?

Please boost for visibility :)

#transgender

in reply to Ten :verified_trans:

I came out as trans when I was 23, but I didn't start testosterone until last year - a full 10 years later!


Had a really long night at a charity LARP event I was invited to, I thought I felt slightly pretty for a moment in the last one picture I shared... But after last night I felt much much more happy and sure of myself.

Edit: alt-text provided by @Janet Logan 🏳️‍⚧️

#selfie #transfemme

This entry was edited (2 months ago)

Shiri Bailem reshared this.


"would you rather have a dead child or a live transitioned child?" isn't a proposition, a threat, or emotional blackmail - it's fucking reality. the act of denying gender-affirming care to trans youth amounts to a literal, active genocide.

if you don't support trans children's, teens', and young adults' ability to transition, then you're a genocide apologist.

reshared this

in reply to Rachel, Femme Doux Naturel

in a way, my generation was lucky. sure, we lived through ace ventura, jerry springer, and all sorts of other media that continually told us that we were disgusting sexual perverts. yes, we lived through gay jokes on the playground and insinuations that any gender nonconformity we took part in was deviant.

but when people spoke about us, it was through stray quips and derogatory comments - not our being very publicly, outspokenly labeled a social plague at the very highest levels of government.

I can't imagine what people like me are going through right now - how sad, fearful, and depressed they must feel.

This entry was edited (2 months ago)